If you read through some of the reviews, you can see they're grinding their teeth through those reviews, so I'm kinda glad I didn't get sourced one directly by Intel. Intel is having to give away games and software that far exceed the cost of the Arc GPUs on their own, which says more than you need to know. Raja Koduri, looking at the teleprompter WAY too much Pricing is aggressive, but did you really think Intel would be pricing Arc A770 higher than $349? I mean, they can't compete with anything from this generation from NVIDIA and AMD, and can only compete against a couple of cards on the lower-end of the Ampere GPU and RDNA 2 GPU scale, let alone the higher-end $500+ or $1000+ graphics cards on the market. Now former Intel CEO Bob Swan said at the time (January 2019) "that's what Intel has been about for the last 50 years, and that's what we expect to do with discrete graphics going forward". how is Intel's process node movement going? Intel Arc GPU control panel software is a total mess, no DX9, 230W power draw.
In an interview just recently with ex-PC Perspective's Ryan Shrout and ex-NVIDIA's Tom Peterson (both at Intel AXG now), Raja said he didn't think it (launching a GPU) would be this hard, yet in January 2019 he said that Intel's IP portfolio at the transistor, firmware, and software levels is "amazing". Raja said that the Intel GPU team saw this as an "opportunity for unleashing the discrete graphics from the constraints of integrated graphics". Read more: Intel Arc A770 reviews go live tomorrow, Raja Koduri arrives on set.Read more: Intel lays ground work down for future domination with GPUs.
0 kommentar(er)
